Post the Third: A Disappointment from a Trusted Author

I always love a good fantasy novel, and Robin McKinley usually does not disappoint. Beauty was absolutely wonderful, Dragonhaven I loved until the very end when it got a bit wonky, and I disliked the slight raciness of either The Blue Sword or The Hero and the Crown (I forget which) but her fantasy is well written and generally fantastic. That being said, something about Rose Daughter fell a bit flat.

The premise is this: a wealthy merchant has three daughters, the youngest named Rose. His wife dies in a foolish accident, after which the merchant angrily banishes all magic of any kind from his household. After his wife’s death his business affairs decline so greatly that, upon the announcement of his failure, the young men engaged to marry his two eldest daughters promptly retract their offers. The family must learn to make do without servants, and Rose, ever the industrious one, sorts through her father’s business papers and finds something about a cottage which her family has inherited. With nothing left for them in the village, the family travels to what is ironically called Rose Cottage. They live there peacefully for quite a while, until one day the merchant finds that there may yet be some money left for him. He journeys back to the city, then returns to Rose Cottage–monetarily disappointed–months later. On his way back, the merchant gets caught in a snowstorm and takes refuge in a strange castle. While there, he pockets a rose so that he might take it to his daughter, but the owner of the castle, the Beast, becomes angry, and says that in return for the rose the merchant must send one of his daughters to live in the castle. Without question it is Rose who volunteers to go, and she finds herself coming to care for the Beast, in addition to fixing up the castle gardens and greenhouse. She learns that the beast was really a man, and that to break the curse on the castle and keep him from becoming a true brute animal, she must make a decision.

It is the false dichotomy of the decision that let me down. Rose was given two choices: either Beast could return to his original human form, and they could rule the surrounding lands from his castle and be known by people everywhere; or Beast would remain in his current form and return with her to the village. She chooses the second option. Her rationale was, after learning from the witch who was giving her these options that the couple would be feared and not loved if they remained in the castle, that even good people can let power go to their head. So, as much as I admire the fact that she understands that power can corrupt and that she can love Beast whether he is handsome or not, I do not like the fact that he remains a beast forever. Beast (we do not learn his name) is in reality human, and it is always better for any creature to be what it truly is. There is also no real basis given for her decision: why only these two choices? Why couldn’t she choose to have him return to human form and rule in the castle, and then decide not to stay in the castle and simply return to the village? And, as many other online reviewers have stated, the whole explanation of the curse is convoluted, confusing, and altogether weak.

So, rating? 2 out of 5 stars

The book sometimes rambled on a bit, what precisely the curse entailed was unclear, and the ending was disappointing. Read if you want, but not something I’d reread.

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. Caitlin Clancy · August 12, 2012

    I must confess that I haven’t read this book, but assuming that all the information in this post is accurate, I find it particularly interesting that the Beast is never given a name. It seems to me that the author’s failure to name this integral character calls into question how she and/or the characters in the story regard him: if he has no name and no one sees fit to give him one, is he truly human? Or, as is perhaps more likely, do they believe he is human but choose (for whatever reason) not to treat him as one?

    I admit that this question may not be relevant. I have, as I said, not read the book. But seeing how our culture almost daily throws the dignity of the human person under the bus, it seems to me that noting little details like the one I pointed out and asking pertinent questions about those details is worth the investment of our time. We are, after all, human ourselves. If we let other humans be treated as Beasts and nothing more, what does that say about the condition we might soon find ourselves in?

    • Nami · August 12, 2012

      Thanks for visiting and commenting!

      I definitely agree we should pay attention to the details and ask question. As I said in my post, I don’t believe the beast has a name other than Beast in the book, but I might be wrong. I don’t have the book with me and my brain might be foggy.

      I don’t think the intent in the book was to cause people to treat him as an animal–quite the opposite. However, if my memory is correct and she did not give him a name, it could be telling, or it simply could be her choice. Often in fairy tales certain characters are not given names. Recall Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, where the prince is never really given a name (although he’s credited as Adam on imdb.com).

  2. reading7mandy · August 12, 2012

    I haven’t read Rose Daughter, but I loved Beauty. I’m a bit disappointed to find from this review that she didn’t live up to Beauty since both are generally different versions of the same story. The only other book I’ve read by McKinley is Sunshine, which I also loved. I want to read more by McKinley, but I think I’ll work my way up to this one.
    http://reading7mandy.wordpress.com/

    • Nami · August 12, 2012

      Thanks for visiting and commenting!

      Yeah. It’s been a while since I’ve read Beauty but I remember really liking it, and Rose Daughter definitely didn’t stand up to it at all. But I would definitely encourage you to try her other books–I like them. Is Sunshine any good? I have to say I’ve been avoiding it because of the whole vampire element in the story. I don’t really like the vampire stuff that people are writing nowadays (not that I don’t like fantasy–I love it) as I prefer the more traditional approach as is found in Stoker’s Dracula. But I’m certainly willing to try Sunshine if it’s good. =)

      • reading7mandy · August 12, 2012

        I really enjoyed Sunshine. It wasn’t your completely typical vampire story where the vampire saves the day. I enjoyed it because the main girl in the story was the heroine instead of the victim. I’ve only read the 2 books McKinley but in both she has really strong heroines and I love books like that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s